MRS.D'S BOOKS ARE AVAILABLE ON AMAZON

The Royal Palm: multi award-winning children's book!

Runaway Clothes:multi award-winning children's book!

Good Morning, World! - Mom's Choice Award Winner

The Trees Have Hearts - Mom's Choice Award Winner

Follow Carlo the Mouse Series!5 books are coming in 2017-2020!

Join The City Kittens and the Old House Cat

The Little Girl Praying on the Hill- Readers' Favorite International GOLD Award Winner

That Is How Things Are - Coming in fall 2017!

Who Will Feed Stacey First? Story 1:Coming 2018!

The Mysterious Life Inside a Closet-A New Children's Book Coming in spring 2018!!

A Beautiful Tribute From My Fans

Saturday, June 16, 2012

The Perfect Library of Children's Classics



PUBLISHED IN THE TELEGRAPH

Ask Lorna: top 100 books for children

Lorna Bradbury selects the perfect library of children's classics that parents can add to over time

4 Gorilla by Anthony Browne (Walker). A beautifully drawn story from the former children’s laureate about a lonely girl who finds company in a gorilla.
4 Gorilla by Anthony Browne (Walker). A beautifully drawn story from the former children’s laureate about a lonely girl who finds company in a gorilla. 






I’ve been so excited by the quality and the range of questions I’ve received since this column kicked off at the beginning of the year: questions concerning every age of reader, and every kind of reading problem; from parents and grandparents, librarians and teachers, and more recently, I’m pleased to say, from children themselves.
Recently I was sent a question from a grandfather – one of many I’ve had from grandparents, I should say – which asked for rather more than this column could deliver in its normal format.
“Your new column on children’s books has arrived just in time for me,” wrote Paul, in an email. “I have recently become a grandfather for the first time and, while my home is full of books, none of them were written for the under-fives. My granddaughter is only a few months old, but I would appreciate both guidance in buying books for children and a possible hit list of 50 books to own before you’re five.”
I’ve been mulling this question over for several weeks. It is clearly rather difficult – not to say a bit arbitrary – to whittle the huge terrain of children’s books down to a list of 50. But I have found it an absorbing exercise, and one that I hope will be of interest to anyone who reads with a child or, indeed, anyone who loves children’s books.
As the question suggests, children’s publishing has changed remarkably over a generation or two. There was nothing like the number, or the breadth, of books being published for children when today’s grandparents were growing up – especially in terms of illustrated stories for the under-fives, and novels aimed at teenagers – most recently in the paranormal or dystopian veins.
I could have answered Paul’s question many times over by selecting just picture books. There are so many inventive illustrated stories for babies and toddlers, and many extremely good ones published in the last decade alone. But I’ve decided to broaden the remit a little, and to think about the books a parent or grandparent might want to consider if they were building a library for a child to last into their second decade.
I’ve steered clear of the furry, noisy kinds of interactive board books that babies and toddlers love, as these can be found prominently displayed in any bookshop or library. I’ve avoided the books that any child will come to automatically as they get older; stories by JK Rowling and Philip Pullman and Jacqueline Wilson, for example, which are so much part of the air that modern children breathe. And I have tended towards distinctive editions of the classics, figuring that parents and grandparents will add to these with more contemporary books over time.
You will notice that I have kept in mind the gender of Paul’s granddaughter, especially in the older section of the list that follows. It would have been different in many respects had I been recommending books for a boy.
The list is divided into three broad sweeps: illustrated stories to read to a toddler – though many of these are likely to continue to be favourites well into primary school; novels for, broadly, eight- to 12-year-olds – or to read to a slightly younger child; and reference books and collections. There are, of course, many omissions, but I am relying on you all to join in and put me right over the coming weeks.
*Please email your questions about children’s books to asklorna@telegraph.co.uk or send them to 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0DT or Tweeting @lornabradbury
Picture Books
Curious George by Margret Rey and HA Rey (Houghton Mifflin). The first book of seven, from 1941, about a monkey who is kidnapped by the man in the yellow hat.
Where the Wild Things Are by Maurice Sendak (Red Fox). One of my favourites as a child, this has gone on to inspire a generation of illustrators – and a very poor film.
Father Christmas by Raymond Briggs (Puffin). The best book about Christmas by some margin, featuring an extremely grumpy Santa. Narrowly beat The Snowman for a place on this list.
Gorilla by Anthony Browne (Walker). A beautifully drawn story from the former children’s laureate about a lonely girl who finds company in a gorilla.
The Mick Inkpen Collection (Hodder). This edition contains seven stories, including my son’s favourite, Billy’s Beetle. You have to find the beetle hiding somewhere on each spread.
There Was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Fly illustrated by Pam Adams (Child’s Play). This edition has holes.
The Babar Collection by Jean de Brunhoff (Egmont). Here are five of the classic French stories, including the first, The Story of Babar, from 1931.
Jim by Hilaire Belloc, illustrated by Mini Grey (Jonathan Cape). The poem is reproduced at picture book length with Grey’s striking illustrations and paper engineering. You could go, if you prefer, for a collection of Belloc, such as Cautionary Verses (Red Fox).
Polar Bear, Polar Bear, What Do You Hear? by Eric Carle (Puffin). This charming verse story about how different animals behave is less well known than The Very Hungry Caterpillar, but more fun.
10 What Do People Do All Day? by Richard Scarry (HarperCollins). Scarry’s immensely detailed books about everyday life can lead to some good conversations, and are great for children who need to know how things work (more or less all of them).
11 The Story of the Little Mole Who Knew It Was None of His Business by Werner Holzwarth and Wolf Erlbruch (Chrysalis). This may not be to everyone’s taste, but there’s no escaping the lavatory when it comes to children’s humour, and this book manages to be educational too.
12 Green Eggs and Ham by Dr Seuss (HarperCollins). Or another of the vast number of books Dr Seuss wrote from the Forties onwards. Excellent fun in verse, and great for learning to read too.
13 Lost and Found by Oliver Jeffers (HarperCollins). First published in 2006, this is already a modern classic.
14 The Adventures of Mrs Pepperpot by Alf Proysen, illustrated by Hilda Offen (Red Fox). This edition contains two abridged versions of these well-loved Norwegian stories about the woman who shrinks.
15 The Gruffalo by Julia Donaldson, illustrated by Axel Scheffler (Macmillan). It may now be over-familiar, but it’s hard to imagine a library without one of Donaldson’s catchy rhyming tales.
16 Monkey and Me by Emily Gravett (Macmillan). Or anything by Gravett, really: an exceptional new(ish) writer and illustrator.
17 Goodnight Moon by Margaret Wise Brown and Clement Hurd (Macmillan). A perfectly soporific bedtime story. Ditto the following.
18 Time for Bed by Mem Fox and Jane Dyer (Houghton Mifflin). You’ll read these books so many times, it’s important to have more than one.
19 Operation Alphabet by Al MacCuish and Luciano Lozano (Thames & Hudson). My favourite book about the alphabet.
20 Hippos Go Berserk by Sandra Boynton (Simon & Schuster). A jolly counting book that goes down as well as up.
Classic novels
21 Beatrix Potter: the Complete Tales (Warne). You can’t have a library without Beatrix Potter, and there’s no messing about with this edition which contains all 23 tales.
22 The Adventures of Tintin by Hergé (Egmont). The collected edition seems to be out of print, but why not go for one of the various volumes which collect several stories at a time?
23 Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll, with illustrations by Yayoi Kusama (Penguin). This beautiful new cloth-bound edition is a must-have.
24 The Phantom Tollbooth by Norton Juster, illustrated by Jules Feiffer (HarperCollins). Alice’s American cousin, this is a story about a boy who is transported to the Kingdom of Wisdom via a magic tollbooth.
25 The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L Frank Baum, with art by Robert Sabuda (Simon & Schuster). This is a classy pop-up edition, based on an abridged version of the text. For the complete text, try the edition by OUP.
26 The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, tr by Katherine Woods (Egmont). A lovely edition, with Saint-Exupéry’s original illustrations.
27 The Winnie-the-Pooh Collection by AA Milne, illustrated by EH Shepard (Egmont). This boxed set contains all four books.
28 Pippi Longstocking by Astrid Lindgren, illustrated by Lauren Child (OUP). These new illustrations by the author of Charlie and Lola provide a contemporary twist on the Swedish classic. (Lindgren’s books about Karlsson and Emil are also very good.)
29 Swallows and Amazons by Arthur Ransome (Red Fox). The first in a series set between the wars at a time when children mucked about in boats and built camps by themselves – or at least we like to think they did.
30 Five on a Treasure Island by Enid Blyton (Hodder). It was a close run thing between the Famous Five and Malory Towers, but I’ve opted for the adventures of George and co. This is the first book in the series. Make sure you get the edition from 1997 with Eileen A Soper’s illustrations, rather than the newer edition in which the text has been modernised.
31 Jo of the Chalet School by Elinor M Brent-Dyer (Girls Gone By). I adored the Chalet School books as a girl – and, thrillingly for children who like to stick with a series they know and like, there are nearly 60 books. Some of them have now fallen out of print, but this one, the second, is as good a place as any to start.
32 The Railway Children by E Nesbit (Puffin). No childhood is complete without this novel from 1905, immortalised by the 1970 film starring Jenny Agutter.
33 The Magician’s Nephew by C S Lewis (HarperCollins), the first in his Chronicles of Narnia series.
34 The Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson Burnett (Templar or Puffin). Choose between two new editions, the Templar one illustrated by Robert Ingpen and the Puffin one by Lauren Child.
35 The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame (Templar or Egmont). Both of these editions are lovely, the former illustrated again by Robert Ingpen and the latter preserving the illustrations by E H Shepard.
36 The Story of Doctor Dolittle by Hugh Lofting (Red Fox). This is the first story about the man who can talk to animals, from 1920. The longer sequel, The Voyages of Doctor Dolittle, which won the Newbery Medal, is trickier to get hold of, especially if you’re after a pretty edition.
37 The BFG by Roald Dahl and Revolting Rhymes by Roald Dahl (both Puffin, and both illustrated by Quentin Blake). I am sneaking in two here – my favourite novel and my favourite of his silly rhymes.
38 Fattypuffs and Thinifers by André Maurois (Jane Nissen Books). The French classic about a fat brother and a thin brother – and the battle that ensues between two warring nations. This edition is illustrated by Raymond Briggs.
39 Anne of Green Gables by LM Montgomery (Puffin). This is the first in the captivating series about the red-headed orphan, published originally in 1908, and the one that covers her early childhood.
40 Little Women by Louisa May Alcott (Puffin). Again, the first book in the series, about the four sisters Meg, Jo, Beth and Amy. It was originally published in the United States in 1868. The sequels are also published by Puffin.
41 Charlotte’s Web by EB White (Puffin). Another American novel, this one is about a pig who is rescued by a spider called Charlotte. I’ve gone for this over Dick King-Smith’s animal tales.
42 The Summer Book by Tove Jansson (Sort Of Books). The Finnish novelist is best known for her series about the Moomins, but I have selected instead a novel for older children about a girl and her grandmother, and the summer they spend together on a remote island.
43 The Greengage Summer or The Peacock Spring by Rumer Godden (Pan). Also for when your granddaughter is in her teens, two coming-of-age stories, the first set in France and the second in India.
Collections and Histories
44 The Oxford Nursery Rhyme Book, edited by Iona and Peter Opie with illustrations by Joan Hassall (OUP). This chunky volume containing every nursery rhyme you can possibly think of is charmingly old fashioned, reproduced in a format that harks back to its first publication in 1955.
45 The Hutchinson Treasury of Children’s Literature, edited by Alison Sage (Hutchinson). Every child’s book shelf needs the breadth of an anthology, and this one contains nearly 100 extracts from nursery rhymes, fairy tales and all kinds of stories.
46 Tales of Hans Christian Andersen, translated by Naomi Lewis and illustrated by Joel Stewart (Walker). Andrew Lang’s collections of fairy tales are great, but I’ve gone for this collection by Hans Christian Andersen as a starter.
47 The Complete Nonsense of Edward Lear (Faber). There are beautiful editions of individual poems, such as “The Quangle Wangle’s Hat” (illustrated by Helen Oxenbury, Mammoth), but why not opt for the collected works?
48 Tales from Shakespeare by Charles and Mary Lamb (Puffin or, in an edition illustrated by Joelle Jolivet, Harry N Abrams). These retellings of the plays are literary works in their own right.
49 Our Island Story: a History of Britain for Boys and Girls from the Romans to Queen Victoria by HE Marshall (Galore Park). An excellent single-volume history of Britain, first published in 1905.
50 A Little History of the World by Ernst Gombrich (Yale). A sophisticated narrative by the art historian which runs up to the First World War, written in language any child can understand.
25 MORE CLASSIC BOOKS FOR CHILDREN, BASED ON READERS' SUGGESTIONS
51 The Tiger Who Came to Tea by Judith Kerr (HarperCollins). Kerr’s books about Mog the cat are still going strong, but this stand-alone story is perhaps her most original.
52 Funny Bones by Janet and Allan Ahlberg (Puffin). Or one of their other classic illustrated tales such as Peepo or Each Peach Pear Plum.
53 Elmer by David McKee (Andersen). The first book about the patchwork elephant.
54 I Love You, Blue Kangaroo by Emma Chichester Clark (HarperCollins). Her loveliest story about Lily and her favourite toy.
55 Little Tim and the Brave Sea Captain by Edward Ardizzone (Frances Lincoln). The first in the series, from 1936.
56 Bread and Jam for Frances by Russell Hoban (HarperCollins US). A charming story about a fussy eater.
57 The Princess and the Pea by Lauren Child (Puffin). A collaboration with the photographer Polly Borland, using miniature furniture.
58 The Velveteen Rabbit by Margery Williams, illustrated by William Nicholson (Egmont). The timeless story of a stuffed rabbit and its quest to become real.
59 Sophie’s Adventures by Dick King-Smith (Walker). Three stories by the great chronicler of farmyard animals.
60 Paddington Races Ahead by Michael Bond (HarperCollins). The newest collection of tales.
61 Carrie’s War by Nina Bawden (Puffin). The wartime story of a girl and her brother evacuated to Wales.
62 Stig of the Dump by Clive King (Puffin). The story of Barney and Stig, who lives in the quarry at the bottom of the garden.
63 The Wolves of Willoughby Chase by Joan Aitkin (Red Fox). First of the Wolves Chronicles.
64 The Magician’s Nephew by CS Lewis (HarperCollins). Box sets of The Chronicles of Narnia are out of print, so here’s the first in the series.
65 The Abominables by Eva Ibbotson (Marion Lloyd). Her final book, about a girl and a settlement of friendly yetis.
66 Ballet Shoes by Noel Streatfeild (Puffin). The classic ballet novel.
67 The Little White Horse by Elizabeth Goudge (Lion). The fantasy about the young orphan girl Maria Merryweather.
68 A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle (Puffin). Another fantasy, the first in the series about Meg Murry and her search for her missing father.
69 Skellig by David Almond (Hodder). A boy, his baby sister – and the creature in the garage.
70 Harry Potter Boxed Set by J K Rowling (Bloomsbury). Contains all seven novels.
71 The Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank (Puffin). The classic Second World War diary.
72 His Dark Materials by Philip Pullman (Scholastic). Box set of the trilogy.
73 Stormbreaker by Anthony Horowitz (Walker). The first of the Alex Rider spy novels.
74 Keeper by Mal Peet (Walker). The ultimate football novel.
75 How I Live Now by Meg Rosoff (Puffin). The best dystopian novel, set in a future England under occupation.
25 Classic Novels for Teenagers
19th-century classics
76 Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen (Wordsworth Classics)
77 Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens (Penguin Classics)
78 Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë (Wordsworth Classics)
79 Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë (Penguin Classics)
20th-century classics
80 A Room with a View by E M Forster (Penguin Classics)
81 Decline and Fall by Evelyn Waugh (Penguin Classics)
82 Thank You, Jeeves by P G Wodehouse (Arrow)
83 Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier (Virago Modern Classics)
84 Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell (Pan Books)
85 The Outsider by Albert Camus (Penguin Modern Classics)
86 1984 by George Orwell (Penguin)
87 Catcher in the Rye by J D Salinger (Penguin)
88 On the Road by Jack Kerouac (Penguin Modern Classics)
89 Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury (Flamingo Modern Classics)
90 Lord of the Flies by William Golding (Faber & Faber)
91 One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (Penguin Modern Classics)
92 Saturday by Ian McEwan (Vintage)
Comedies
93 The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams (Gollancz)
94 The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole Aged 13 ¾ by Sue Townsend (Penguin)
Short stories
95 The Collected Stories of Katherine Mansfield (Wordsworth Editions)
96 Kiss Kiss by Roald Dahl (Penguin)
Crime novels
97 Miss Marple Omnibus: Volume One by Agatha Christie (HarperCollins)
98 Murder Must Advertise by Dorothy L Sayers (New English Library)
99 The Spy Who Came in from the Cold by John le Carré (Penguin Modern Classics)
100 Faceless Killers by Henning Mankell (Vintage)
Please email your questions about children’s books to asklorna@telegraph.co.uk or send them to 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London SW1W 0DT. You can comment on this story or recommend your favourite books at telegraph.co.uk/books and follow @lornabradbury on Twitter
Buy all these children's book at the Telegraph Bookshop
Previous Ask Lorna columns:

ALL COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE SHOULD BE FORWARD TO THE AUTHOR.
COURTESY OF Lorna Bradbury


Thank you for reading this article. I hope you found it interesting and helpful. 




MAKE FUN FOOD FOR TODDLERS

Friday, June 15, 2012

Self-publishing is the Wave of the Future

PUBLISHED IN BookDaily Staff

The House Always Wins

Courtesy of Victoria Brown
Why I Formed My Own Publishing House

By now we all know self-publishing is the wave of the future (think iTunes and the music industry). This means more authors are self-publishing, and more people are reading self-published books either on their e-readers or in print.
If you’re going to self-publish, should you form your own publishing house?
You don’t have to, but that was the route I decided to take. I formed a one-person, one-book (for now) publishing house. It’s a sole proprietorship, because I wanted to keep it simple, and incorporation is complicated and expensive.

A sole proprietorship requires virtually no paperwork, and one of the benefits is that virtually every expense involved with getting your book into ready for e-readers or print is tax deductible. Make sure you keep track of every expense related to bringing your book to market. Ask your accountant as soon as you begin your WIP which expenses are deductible, and then keep meticulous track of everything, down to the penny. I use Quicken.
First, I named the company “Woodchuck Publishers.” I hear a collective chorus saying, “Huh?” Does it help you to know I live on Woodchuck Lane? It was a no-brainer.

After I landed on a name, I created a logo and a website/blog.
I went through the tedious process of trying to understand ISBNs. The ISBN is a number that uniquely identifies your book for publishers, distributors, and bookstores.

You need a different ISBN for each version of the book. First, you need one for your e-book. You can use the same ISBN for an e-book offered on different sites such as Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Smashwords, and more.
Then you need another ISBN if you are going to sell a print version, which I am doing with Amazon’s sister company CreateSpace. CreateSpace provides a barcode for the print version, or you can buy your own from Bowker. Once you have the barcode on the back cover, you won’t be able to adjust the price for the print book unless you use a different ISBN and barcode.

One of the main reasons I wanted my own publishing brand was so that Woodchuck Publishers would be listed as the publisher of record in Books in Print. Libraries worldwide consult Books in Print to find titles, create lists, and decide which vendor, e-book platform or online retailer to source the title. If you get a free ISBN, the issuer is listed as the publisher of record. For example, if I used CreateSpace’s free ISBN, then CreateSpace is listed as the publisher. I didn’t want to do that, so I bought my own ISBNs from Bowker.

And if you’re wondering…yes, I do tweet (@VBrownWriter). Although I don’t expect to make sales through my Twitter connections, my tweeps offered a wealth of information about self-publishing through blog posts.
One last word: To be successful, there is one critical component: Write a good book. No amount of business savvy is going to make up for a stinker of a book.

Want Your Book Featured Next To Bestsellers?

BookDaily Staff



Thank you for reading this article. I hope you found it interesting and helpful.

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Granny’s Guide to Twitter

PUBLISHED  IN TWITCHY

Granny’s Guide to Twitter

by Dan Collins, former Twitchy.com editor

Twitter is one of the many social media platforms on the Internet, such as Facebook, instant messaging, Google+ and a host of others that people use to communicate with one another. One of the things that differentiates Twitter from the others is that in Twitter each message is confined to a total of 140 characters, including spaces. Every short message (or “tweet”) that each Twitter user (or “twitterer”) sends can potentially be seen by every person who “follows” you on his or her timeline. Those people are your “followers.” Likewise, you can see every public tweet sent by another twitterer whom you follow as it appears in your timeline. A timeline is simply the sequence of tweets sent by yourself and the people whom you follow as they emerge. Here’s a section from one of mine:
This is how a Twitter page might appear when you log into it at the web site, http://twitter.com. In the upper left hand corner, you see statistics about your use of Twitter: how many tweets you’ve sent, how many twitterers you follow and how many follow you. Beneath that, Twitter suggests people whom you might wish to follow, based on a complicated interpreting equation (algorithm) that it uses to assess the kinds of twitters you already follow. Beneath that are trends that give an idea of what many people are tweeting about right now. To the right is your timeline, a moment-by-moment compilation of all the tweets sent by all the people whom you follow.
At the top of the right-hand side, the bar at the moment is indicating that there are twenty new tweets from people whom I follow. If I’ve digested what I want out of the present view, I can click on that, and twenty or so tweets will appear at the top, displacing the ones I’ve been viewing further towards the bottom. The little pictures you see are called avatars, often shortened to avis. Sometimes they are of the twitterer, and sometimes not, just as the “handles” or Twitter user names, are sometimes their proper names and sometimes not. For example, viewing the second from the bottom user here, you can see that she uses the name @unicornmajik on Twitter, but her actual name is Susan Rector. Included in her tweet is a headline with a link to the story and at the end the identity of the twitterer from whom she received the information. If the link is well formed, you may click on the blue text and a new page will open with that story. On the far right, you get an idea of how long ago a particular tweet was sent at the time you last refreshed your screen. Behind, you can catch a glimpse of my Twitter page’s background, which I chose from Hieronymous Bosch. Other people have chosen their own, or chosen one of the numerous pre-determined options that Twitter provides, available in settings.
Avatars are easy to change on Twitter, simply by altering one’s settings. It’s also possible for twitterers to change their handles, though this is a little more complicated and is liable to sow confusion and cause followers to be lost, at least in the short run. It’s important, therefore, to settle on a user name that doesn’t reflect some short-term preoccupation. Keeping in mind the 140 character limitation, it’s also best, if you can manage it, to keep the handle short, so that it doesn’t take up too much space in tweets. The artist known as Jim Treacher, for example, uses @jtlol (for Jim Treacher, laugh out loud). Other such shortenings of common expressions include IMO (for in my opinion) and TWSS (that’s what she said). Because it’s online, and because it’s sometimes hard to convey irony and sarcasm, statements that might be misinterpreted are often followed by emoticons such as ;-) or :-) to indicate do the person or persons whom you are tweeting to that you’re on their side. Interpreted sincerity or its lack can sometimes lead to disagreeable quarrels, so it is best to take care to make your intentions clear, because Twitter, like other online forms of communication, lacks such cues as facial expressions or body language. Use of sarcasm and irony is referred to as “snark,” and those who use it habitually or hurtfully are often characterized as “snarky.”
That @ symbol is one of the important cues in Twitter. Every Twitter name that’s being addressed has that symbol before it. My handle on Twitter, for example, is @vermontaigne, which is a mash-up of Vermont, where I had been living for ten years until recently, and Montaigne, the great Renaissance essayist. Even so, when people view my tweets from the Twitter web site, they will see displayed to the left of my handle in my tweets my name, just as Susan Rector’s is displayed to the left of @unicornmajik. What is displayed there, though, is under your control. It is possible to fill in your sign-up at Twitter so that your identity remains anonymous to other users, and it is similarly possible to make all of your tweets private, so that they are viewable only by those persons to whom you give permission.
Another important symbol is #, which is called a “hashtag” when it is used as it is on Twitter. A “hashtag” is created and used to cue the attention of people who are interested in the same subjects. For example, people who were deeply affected by the untimely death of Whitney Houston might share news, statements and observations by using #whitneyhouston or just #whitney. If you were to use the search box at the top, Twitter would compile for you all the most recent posts by people identified by that hashtag or subject marker. Other hashtags might not be so obvious. Top Conservatives on Twitter use #tcot, and Occupy Wall Street use #ows. Naturally, each side uses the other’s hashtag to snark at or hurl insults at the other. On Twitter, the sending of such unwanted messages, whether by hashtag or directly to someone’s handle is called “spamming,” whether it’s technically spam (a term taken from unwanted email solicitations sent to one’s account) or not. Likewise, a person who is in some way opposed to one is likely to be denominated a “troll” by the person or persons to whom he sends unwanted messages. Twitter has its actual spammers, who will try to get twitterers to visit their commercial sites, up to and including porn sites, and also spammers who will try to get twitterers to open links that will infect their computers with viruses. If you are sent a message by someone whom you don’t know, it is always best to click on the avatar to find out a little about that user before opening anything that they have sent to you. If a person signs up for Twitter without uploading an image, they will be assigned an avatar in the shape of an egg. When you inspect further, you are liable to discover that that person has few followers and is following few people, and that the messages in their timeline are all inducements to click on the same link. Don’t. You may choose to ignore such users or to block and report them, but if you report someone, do your homework first to determine that they’re not simply some obnoxious person, but an actual spammer. Obnoxious people and generous people abound on Twitter, and a person who is momentarily obnoxious to one may turn out to be quite generous to others. It is important that we respect the rights of all to express themselves on Twitter, though it is certainly fair game to block someone for frequently employing expletives or other vulgarities.
When you see a tweet to which you would like to respond, mouse or touch pad just to the left of the time stamp at the upper right hand corner of the tweet, and you will see several options emerge. If you hover over them, you will see that the first one is for replying, and resembles a keyboard “return” sign, featuring an arrow pointing to the left. If you click on that, a box will appear with that person’s handle already filled in, ready for you to send a message to that person.
You are now cued up to type what you would like to say. You see on the bottom right that you have 126 characters left with which to send your message to this person. Just below is the message to which you are presumably responding. In addition to including links, you have the options to attach a photograph (at the camera sign) or to include your location (the target or surveyor’s symbol). After you’ve composed your message, you click the Tweet button and it is sent.
If you wish to send a message that doesn’t respond to anything tweeted by someone else on twitter, simply type it into the message box that is always at the upper left of your Twitter page. If you wish to address it to a specific person, add, either at the beginning or end, that person’s handle, beginning with the @ sign. You may do this with multiple recipients too, by adding all their handles beginning with @, with spaces in between. Handles must consist of letters numbers and non-punctuation marks only.
In this case, the message will be visible both to the person to whom you’re sending it and to anyone who follows that person. You may, if you prefer, send this person a private message. The way to do this would be to place your cursor before the @ sign and to type in the letter d (for direct) and a space. You may even get rid of the @ before the rest of the handle when you are direct messaging. That message will be sent to that person’s direct or private mail, viewable only by him. Keep in mind, however, that unless your tweets are locked—and this will keep the numbers of your followers low—a person may copy and paste your message into a publicly viewable tweet, so you must still be careful what you say if you don’t consider this person trustworthy. As a general rule, it is very bad form to share another person’s private message without that person’s expressed permission, and it is liable to get one shunned. One of the great attractions of Twitter is its immediacy, but that is also one of its dangers. It is much easier to be circumspect in a long post at a blog, where the time used in composing is also time for reflection, than it is on Twitter. Often, sharp comments on the spur of the moment are best left to oneself, despite the temptation to get a whack in what amounts practically to “real time.” If you do decide that a sharp comment is necessary or desirable, please make sure that you have full understanding of the context before you hit the tweet button. You can find the comment by clicking on a person’s avatar and viewing their timeline. Let’s imagine, hypothetically, that a person named Kurt Schlicter has tweeted something that you find uncaring. Clicking on his avatar will bring you to this screen.
You can see his last several tweets, and by clicking on the blue lettering that says “View more Tweets,” you can inspect a much greater block of his timeline. It may be that Kurt is responding to an insult hurled at him by someone in an earlier tweet. Imagining once again, for the sake of argument, that that were the case, you might decide to let it go and not become embroiled in a quarrel that’s not worth your while.
Another important function of Twitter is “retweeting.” If you find yourself in agreement with a person’s tweet, or simply think that it deserves a wider audience for whatever reason, including its manifest ridiculousness, you can “retweet” it. Placing your cursor just to the right of where you would hover it to send a reply, you will see the closed loop symbol for a retweet. Clicking on that gives you a message box that’s already largely filled in, like this:
One of the weaknesses of Twitter as it exists in the official web application is that you can’t alter the message when you retweet, except by copying it and pasting it into a reply box with your comments. That is one reason that many people use other applications that they feel give greater flexibility to Twitter. If you retweet someone’s message, many followers will view that as an endorsement of the message. You may have to explain to them after the fact that it is not, or you can copy and retweet with your view.
It’s usually a good idea to go the latter route, when you can. If you change something in someone’s tweet when retweeting in this manner, you can indicate that by changing the prefix RT (for retweet) to MT. MT works the same as the command RT, but it shows that you have altered the text, even if it is simply by shortening it, and it is courteous to use the MT command, because you may have omitted some context or made the tweet less immediately legible (for instance by employing contractions rephrasing or eliminating determiners). If you change something substantive, you should always use MT to indicate that. If you fix a spelling or grammatical error, it’s not necessary to do so, unless you wish to embarrass rather than help the original tweeter. If you’re retweeting a message by someone you like and agree with, make it a habit to fix their errors before you accidentally shame them by sharing them with your followers, but . . . don’t be a pedant. This is meant to be an informal method of communication.
Notice that when most people post links to Twitter, they use link shorteners to make them more compact. Twitter has its own URL shortener that you can use, but it is not the most efficient one, in case you need the extra room. To give you an idea of why that’s important, when you have only 140 characters, here’s a link to a post at my blog:
And here is that link shortened with one of may of the available link-shorteners on the Internet, in this case, Word Press, which is a blogging platform:
When someone clicks on the shortened link, their browser is sent very momentarily to the link-shortening site, then directed to the proper page. Some popular link shorteners include:
Owl.ly
Deck.ly
Su.pr
And there are many more. Remember that brevity is the soul of twit. Observe how other people manage to say what they mean to say within the 140-characters limit, and you’ll soon find yourself getting right to the point. There are means available to stretch your message, if you need to, such as by using an ellipsis . . . to show that you’re going to continue your message in the subsequent tweet, or by using [cont.]. Some twitterers resort to using services that will open into a message box that contains more than 140 characters, such as twitlonger, but it is best whenever possible to stick with the parameters assigned by Twitter, so that people don’t have to leave their timestreams to see what you mean to say.
You can also “favorite” a tweet to refer to it whenever you wish, for example, if someone’s link sends you to a long article that you just don’t have the time to do justice to right now, or if they connect you with a Twitter-connected post or service that you are likely to want to refer to time and again. Favoriting a tweet is Twitter’s version of a bookmark, but it also pays a compliment to the tweeter, particularly if the tweet is of his own composition rather than a pointer to another resource. Try to use your favorites sparingly in this way, so as not to devalue them.
Some of you may have used Google+ at some point, and some may find they enjoy it and want to stick with it in addition to Twitter, Facebook, or whatever other social media they find fun or useful. One of the selling points of Google+ is that the user can group various online friends and acquaintances into Circles. For example, you may address your buddies about topics or using language that normally you would not address to your Great Aunt Marian. In Twitter, you can refine your timestream by creating “lists.” These are, in effect, sub-timestreams. You may wish to gather all your news junkie friends into one list, people who agree with you regarding politics into another, and the other folks on the PTA advisory board into still another, and finally those who share your passion for NASCAR, so that you don’t have to go searching for the information that’s relevant to your present interest. I have before mentioned that some of the applications that re-present Twitter for you have certain advantages, and one of them is that they often provide columns on your screen wherein you can simultaneously view your general timestream, messages directed specifically to you but shared publicly, direct messages which are private to you, and any lists that you may have created. In the technical sense, that means that you can supervise them all at once. My recommendation is that you learn to use Twitter first as its presented at its own site, then once you have a reasonable mastery consider whether you might like to use one of those applications. I say this in part because every so often Twitter goes down because of technical issues or because the Twitter people are changing something about it. In that case, all of the applications become temporarily unusable. However, every Twitter application also has its downtime for the same reasons, and at those times Twitter is accessible still through its own site. That said, here are some of the Twitter applications (called clients) that you can use to sort things out, as listed by Top Ten Review’s 2012 post.
Of course, it is an easy matter to tweet your followers to ask for their own recommendations. People love to share their opinions, as a general rule.
To whom might Twitter be attractive? To people who are interested in what other people are broadcasting and who would like to broadcast, in the moment. Let’s say that you are a sports junkie, but often find that you cannot follow [insert your team name here] as closely as you like because you find yourself often on the road or because you have demanding children who prefer to watch their shows and who want your attention right now, where right now is almost all the time. You can easily use your smart phone to follow not only the regularly updated scores other fans of [insert your team name here] are providing, but also their deft and daft commentary on the game, practically in real time. Or let us say for a topical example that you have relatives in Syria, and are deeply concerned about what is going on with the Assad regime. Syrians who tweet and people who follow events in Syria will keep you apprised of what is going on right now, before it appears in an AP article, and sometimes their versions of events will be quite different from what appears via the wire services or other reports. Some of these observers may actually have a better understanding of what is happening than what is provided in filtered reports, as well, and in many cases tweeters will present information and accounts that will not make news sources, either because of censorship or bias. The same is true of local and national news in the United States. Or, you may wish to know that the Girl Scout meeting scheduled for this evening has been cancelled due to weather as soon as that information is available. On the other hand, you may wish to broadcast information. For example, if you are a college teacher, you may wish to tweet your students that the bookstore has still not acquired the edition of Jane Eyre that you ordered, so they’ll be reading Frankenstein this week instead. You could send that via email, but there’s no guarantee that they’ll bother to read that between now and when next you meet, because their smart phones will only show them that they have unread emails, not that one is from you. On the other hand, if you send it to your group as a tweet, it will be displayed as coming from you, their professor. It is like sending a text message to a group of people, only much easier. Or, you may work for some kind of campaign, be it political or associated with a charity with which you are involved. If you send a message via email to your subscriber list, you reach them and whoever else one of them might choose to forward to from their email. If you tweet your message, it’s much easier for your recipients to share that information to the people who follow them, and they in turn may broadcast it again to their followers. In those senses, Twitter can be used as an amplifier of the information that you wish to broadcast.
You may be going on a blind date, and all of your friends might be on tenterhooks to hear how it’s going. When this date repairs to the bathroom, you have a chance to bring them up to date. You have just gone to see a movie that Roger Ebert has praised to the skies, and it’s absolutely dreadful. You can wave your friends away from it, and castigate Ebert in the same tweet, as he’s also on Twitter. Or imagine that Nicki Minaj does something absolutely revolting at the Grammys. You can use Twitter to tell her just how you feel about it.
Not everyone who tries Twitter finds it to their liking, but those who do find it habit forming. Some people even claim to use Twitter as a productivity tool, which is possible. There’s such a wealth of information available online that it’s hard to know where to turn. People who share interests similar to yours will often find resources that you had no idea even existed. In this sense, Twitter is a more intelligent version of Stumble Upon. You may find that your Yahoo home page, or your Google Reader are becoming stale to you. Twitter can help you find new sources of information on the subjects that interest you. Perhaps you would like to make new friends. All of who frequent Twitter find that we do. Some of us even know couples who met each other because of Twitter. It’s much more immediate in that respect than Facebook, or the comments section of a blog. To put it simply, it is much more conversational. If you stay with Twitter, whether you use it frequently or not, you will find yourself becoming part of and also helping to create communities.
Sign up at http://twitter.com and give it a try. You may find that it becomes part of the fabric of your life. Do remember to upload an avatar and to fill in your self description. These are cues to other twitterers that you wish to be a presence on Twitter and are willing to make the effort. You may have friends who are already using Twitter. You can generally find this information cross-referenced from their other social media user profiles. In a pinch, you can use the search box at the top of your Twitter page to try to look people up, but this tends to be clumsy. The very best way to network on Twitter is to notice to whom your friends address themselves and check out their profiles and timelines, then simply add them by clicking the Follow button. You may also watch those people whom the people you follow retweet often, and decide to add them. If you are following someone who is a celebrity, either in meatspace (the “real world”) or online, they may not follow you back. A person who has many followers generally doesn’t have the time to respond to them all, and sometimes they are caught in a situation where they feel uncomfortable playing favorites or appearing to do so. Or, they may only care for sycophants. Either way, there will be people who are broadcasting information that you may find interesting who will not follow you back. It might be that they simply haven’t noticed. Unless you know them from another context, it’s best simply to let it ride. You may consider those one-way relations to be like watching a television broadcaster.
On the other hand, those celebrities, online or otherwise, who do make an effort to respond to what others might regard as insignificant people deserve your praise and goodwill. The Golden Rule applies in Twitter as elsewhere in life for most of us. If someone addresses you directly, please make it your practice to respond. If they retweet something you’ve written, thank them, and return the favor when the spirit moves you. There are a million reasons to use Twitter, but in order to be recognized isn’t, as a rule, very far down on most people’s lists. Be whom you would like others to believe you are on Twitter, and when they grace you by generously accepting the premise, generously return the favor. It is by means of this kind of pretending that we come closer to becoming that person.
There is no reason for you to feel compelled to follow rude or aggressive people on Twitter, unless you find nastiness amusing, but do try to keep some people whose views aren’t in line with your own in your timelines, so that it doesn’t become an echo chamber. Twitter has the potential to be very democratic in the best sense, but too often it becomes an echo chamber for some form of narrow elitism. You can practice tolerance and equanimity on Twitter, and it will carry over to your “real life,” as many things in Twitter are apt to do (such as “tweet-ups,” where twitterers from the same area congregate in meatspace).
Disagreements and arguments are a part of Twitter, but don’t get too caught up in them. Above all, Twitter is supposed to be fun. If you find that too much of your time on Twitter is consumed in bickering, you’re probably doing it wrong. If you find yourself exasperated, take a break or change the topic. It’s not realistic to think that you’re going to bring people around to your view even in a long series of 140-character tweets, and more often than not, sniping exchanges will grow tiresome for those who witness them and cause all concerned to lose some face. Go forth and tweet, but if you find yourself in continual broils, perhaps you should look in the mirror.
I hope to see you there.

COURTESY OF Dan Collin
Thank you for reading this article. I hope you found it interesting and helpful.